Bemerkungen zum Imperfekt im Navaho
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18441/ind.v2i0.33-46Abstract
Linguists disagree on the number of imperfective paradigms used in Navaho. Young and Morgan think that there are five or even six different types; according to Sapir and Hoijer thero are three whereas Krauss and Stanley reduce the number to two. An examination of the problem shows that one must differentiate between at least four paradigms. The second person singular is recommended as a starting-point for the classification as in this case most variants of form exist.Downloads
Published
1974-01-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 1974 INDIANA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work unchanged with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to distribute the work themselves with information on its initial publication, e.g. upload it to open repositories linked to their personal website or institutional affiliation, or publish it in a book.
