Examen de la teoría aimarista de Uhle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18441/ind.v15i0.79-106Abstract
This article is focused on the 'aymarism' and 'quechuism' point of view in studying the linguistic and cultural history of the Central Andes advocated by Max Uhle as well as formerly Ernst W. Middendorf and by José de la Riva Agüero respectively. Both approaches provide arguments in favor of their respective views on the origins, successive geographical diffusion, and mutual influences of the languages Quechua and Aymara. The analysis takes into consideration the general state of information characterizing the epoch when the scholars in question did their investigations as well as their specific premises and attitudes. Finally, their work will be estimated concerning the investigations on Andean linguistics and ethnohistory of recent time.Downloads
Published
1998-01-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 1998 INDIANA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work unchanged with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to distribute the work themselves with information on its initial publication, e.g. upload it to open repositories linked to their personal website or institutional affiliation, or publish it in a book.